Operating Agent: Hans Erhorn,
Frauhofer Institute of Building Physics, Nobelstr. 12, D-70569 Stuttgart.
Germany.
Tel: +49 711 970 3380
Fax: +49 711 970 3399
Email: erh@ibp.fhg.de
Website:www.annex36.com
Summary
Educational buildings such as kindergartens, schools, training centres and universities display many similar design, operation and maintenance features throughout many of the IEA countries. For example, many have similar structures, often need to be retrofitted and have high energy consumption. Because of the level of similarity that exists within this building sector, experiences gained in developing different approaches to combat similar problems, especially during retrofitting, can easily be transferred to other countries.
Two overwhelming similarities amongst these types of buildings are the high energy consumption and necessity to retrofit many buildings within this sector. However, studies have shown that during retrofit energy saving measures are only rarely applied, because of a lack of knowledge by the decision makers regarding the investments and the efficiency of potential energy saving measures. Because of the lack of information, in many cases decisions are made that do not accurately take into account energy saving aspects. There are no "rules of thumb" to enable a quick and easy estimation of the levels of required investment, before an analysis of the building structure in detail.
Therefore the development of an energy concept adviser for economical retrofit measures would be useful during the planning and realization phase, on the one hand to help the investor to find the energetically and economically most efficient energy saving measures and also to prevent him from exaggerated expectations. The adviser should be applicable during the entire retrofitting phase to ensure that both the calculated energy savings and the economical success will be achieved after retrofitting. This annex therefore aimed to develop such a tool.
The objectives of this annex were :
-
To develop simple prediction tools for retrofit concepts which allow the decision maker to evaluate integrated construction, installation and lighting measures.
-
To develop a concept adviser to analyse existing buildings and the economic efficiency and to supplement it by simple methods for testing the efficiency of the applied measures.
-
To promote energy and cost efficient retrofit measures and to support the decision makers in evaluating the efficiency and acceptance of available concepts.
Subtask A: Selection and Analysis of Existing Information
(Subtask Leader: Dr. Tomasz Mroz, Poznan University of Technology, Poland.)In this Subtask existing information and knowledge in the IEA member countries was collected and analysed. The state-of-the-art knowledge were documented and differences between the countries indentified to make evident existing gaps of knowledge and to point out appropriate solutions, which were elaborated within the other Subtasks. The work mainly focused on requirements, guidelines, building types, technologies, benchmarks and decision criteria. Experts of the participating countries collected and prepared extensive information on special topics to be provided for the Annex participants as knowledge transfer.
Results
· Report consisting of a catalogue of benchmarks and solutions for different educational building types (technologies, materials)
· Working Document on parameters / design guidelines (draft) for good learning and teaching environment
· Working Document on design criteria (e.g. economic analysis, functional requirements).
Subtask B: Case Studies
(Subtask Leader: Dr. Ove Mork, Cenergia, Denmark)The Annex case studies included a collection both of exemplary completed and of 8-10 "new", innovatively retrofitted buildings (from the late 90's) of which a few were still under construction and due to be finished in 2000 - 2002. The case studies included schools, institutional and laboratory buildings, with innovative energy saving measures, day- and artificial lighting systems with advanced control systems. Measured performance data included temperatures, illuminances and other comfort criteria of the interior space, heating, cooling and electrical lighting consumption, the power consumption of the installations and control systems, the total building energy consumption and the indoor air quality. User acceptance of environmental conditions was assessed through questionnaires. In a design forum, national concepts of planned demonstration projects were reviewed and compared to the experience gained in the other countries.
Results
· Design Guidelines for retrofitting of educational buildings
· Case Studies Report with documented evidence of energy saving potential of retrofitting processes.
Subtask C: Software Development and Analysis Methods
(Subtask Leader: Dr. Fritz Schmidt, University of Stuttgart, Germany)The used design tools included selected tools, ranging from simple spreadsheets to advanced computer programs that took into account the impact of light, heat and cooling in buildings. Work on simple and integrated design tools included validation as well as the improvement of user interface and optimization of calculation procedures. Work on analysis methods focused on short-term measurements and on the comparison of audit procedures and evaluation measures.
Results
· Working Document on simple calculation tools for decision makers by setting up benchmarks, regulations and spreadsheets
· Report on energy audit procedures including short-term measurements for components and systems (comparison and recommendations)
· Working Document including a list of principles and systems to simulate in retrofitting projects and an evaluation of design tools (list and recommendation)
· Working Document on operating procedure including check list (manual) and evaluation of special measures by means of energy auditing, short-term measurement and questionnaires.
Subtask D: Documentation and Dissemination
(Subtask Leader: Lorenz Schoff, DOE, United States of America)Documents and dissemination focus on the transfer of the research results to be used by practitioners. Several methods were used for information dissemination. Besides the conventional ways of dissemination, such as newsletters and practice articles, media like the Internet was also used. Apart from publications written in the English language, publications in the languages of the participating countries were also produced.
Results
· Website
· Articles
· Newsletters
· Conference papers.
Joint Working Group "Energy Concept Adviser"
(Leader: Operating Agent Hans Erhorn, Fraunhofer Institute of Building Physics, Germany)All Subtasks provided their results as input to the joint working group. Based on the results the joint working group developed an electronic interactive source book (Energy Concept Adviser). A central database includes all Annex results and allows the user later on to get extensive information, according to his/her individual focus of interest, on design inspirations, design advice, decision tools and design tools. Thus, the user is able to increase his knowledge in the respective field of interest quickly and reliably. The user has the choice of analyzing design scenarios her-/himself and/or use the pool of experience gained in the case studies projects to access information on energy saving potentials and requirements.
Results
Electronic interactive source book including design inspirations, design advice, decision tools, design tools.
Participating Countries
The Annex has participation from 9 countries which are:· Denmark (represented by Cenergia Energy Consultants and Danish Building Research Institute)
· Finland (represented by VTT Building Technology Facility Management and VTT Communities and Infrastructure)
· France (represented by ENTPE)
· Germany (represented by Fraunhofer Institute of Building Physics and University of Stuttgart)
· Greece (represented by University of Athens)
· Italy (represented by ENEA)
· Poland (represented by Poznan University of Technology and Silesian University of Technology)
· U.S.A. (represented by U.S. Department of Energy)
· United Kingdom (represented by DfES UK Architects & Building Branch and BRE)
Publications Annex 36 |
PREVIOUS | NEXT |
Technical Synthesis Report: Retrofitting in Educational Buildings: Energy Concept Adviser for Technical Retrofit Measures
Edited by Richard Barton
UK, Faber Maunsell Ltd, due 2007
Case Study Reports
Edited by Ove Morck
September 2003
Contents
Order Printed Copy £25.00 (Order Code ANN 36 2003:1)
The following deliverables for Annex 36 are now complete and available at the Annex 36 website.
Energy Concept Adviser
2005 (ECA program, ECA manual)
KULU – a tool for commissioning
(KULU program, KULU manual)
State of the Art Overview: Questionnaire Evaluations
edited by Tomasz Mroz, Hans Erhorn (Subtask A Report)
Overview of Retrofitting Measures
edited by Tomasz M Mroz, September 2003 (Subtask A Report)
Calculation Tools for the Energy Concept Adviser
Fritz Schmidt et al, July 2004 (Subtask C Report)
Energy Audit Procedures
edited by Jan de Boer, December 2003 (Subtask C Report)
Annex 36 Newsletters can be viewed here